Astrophysical Priests Go In Search of Right Spinning Neutrinos, and Time Going Backwards,; Conjure Up an Anti- Universe
This Blogger has a special affection for the concept of TIME; he became a fervent Believer in Divinity while reading Stephen Hawking’s A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME. In explaining the creation of the Universe, Astrophysicist Stephen Hawking asked his Readers to imagine a time, before the Big Bang, without Time, a Time before Time, a Time without Time.
In reading Hawking’s request, this Blogger came to the conclusion that Astrophysics was a Holy Text; a Belief System wrapped in transitory Science; a Holy Text on par with the Torah, the Old Testament, the Koran, the New Testament, or the Mahabharata. If anyone can imagine a time before Time, without Time, one can reasonably believe that a whale swallowed Jonah.
If one can believe in a Time without Time, one can easily believe in God. For it can be argued that God invented Time; for if TIME was a natural phenomenon, Mankind could go both back in time, and forward in time; physics tells us that should be possible. But against the laws of physics, Time is an arrow, going only one way- forward. If one built a time machine in 2022, one could go to the year 2050; but the Time Traveler would not be able to return to 2022. Time goes against physics, and anything which goes against the natural laws of physics is Divine.
The scientific fact that Time is Time, and only goes one way, forward and not backwards has greatly discombulated astrophysicists; for Time going only forward goes against physics itself.
In 2022, astrophysicists, being the scientific priests that they are, and not the scientists they should be, have solved that problem. By inventing another universe, in which Time goes backward.
In college one learned that recorded History was divided into BC(Before Christ) and AD( after Christ’s Death). Caesar lived in a time frame going backwards; he was born in 100 BC and was slain in 44 BC. Whereas, Abraham Lincoln lived going forward, born in 1809; slain in 1865.
In the new universe speculated on, everything goes backwards.
It is an anti-universe; where time runs backwards.
“…The researchers think that there was a ‘backwards universe’ before the Big Bang that was then inverted to create the universe we live in today.
“This, in turn, leads to a remarkably economical explanation of the cosmological dark matter.”
Neutrino particles are present in our universe but they only spin to the left.
The researchers think the right spinning particles could be invisible in our universe and could just be represented by dark matter.
Where are the right-handed neutrinos? Where is Time flowing backwards? Where is dark matter seen? In the anti-universe of course.
In recorded History, there have been personages who have had near death experiences; in those experiences, they have seen Heaven. No one has ever seen the anti-universe, full of right spinning neutrinos. Which begs the question- which is more plausible to believe in Heaven or an anti-universe?
“All of us experience time moving forward — we age, and have memories from the past, but no idea what will happen in the future. However, nothing in the laws of physics asserts that time must move forward.
Is it possible that there exists a place where time actually moves backwards? In theory, yes, in what are called mirror universes.
To understand why time seems to only move in one direction, many physicists believe it comes down to entropy, the level of molecular disorder in a system, which is always increasing.
However, two separate groups of physicists are working on models that look at how the initial conditions, such as the Big Bang, might have created the arrow of time, and remarkably, both show time moving in two different directions.
The Big Bang created our universe, it may have also created a mirror universe where time moves in the opposite direction. So from our perspective, time in this parallel universe moves backwards. However, anyone in the parallel universe would perceive our universe’s time as moving backwards.
The first model, published just over a year ago in Physical Review Letters, states that one of the implications of Newton’s theory of gravity creates the conditions for time to move in a certain direction.
Julian Barbour from the University of Oxford, Tim Koslowski from the University of New Brunswick, and Flavio Mercati from the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics argue that for any confined system of particles — for example, a self-contained universe, not affected by anything outside of it, like ours — gravity will create a point when the distance between particles is minimal.
And when the particles begin to expand outwards, they will do so in two different directions. Barbour and his colleagues created a simple 1,000 particle point model of the universe showing this dual expansion, with gravity creating structure in both directions.
The moment before the expansion is called the Janus point. “Time is not something that pre-exists,” Barbour told Quartz. “The direction and flow of time we have to deduce from what’s happening in the universe. When we look at it that way, it’s natural to say that time begins at that central point and flows away in opposite directions.”
…..fortunately, even though time could be flowing in different directions, we will probably never be able to experience the reverse. “We’re on one side of the Janus point,” Mercati told Quartz. “On one side you get your arrow of time and can never experience the other one. It’s in your past.”
According to New Scientist, two other physicists, Sean Carroll from California Institute of Technology in Pasadena and Alan Guth from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, created a similar model that shows time moving in two different directions, in two parallel universes, from the Big Bang.
….“We call it the two-headed arrow of time,” Guth told New Scientist. “Because the laws of physics are invariant, we see exactly the same thing in the other direction.”
This theory is still far from widely accepted, but it is based on classical physics. Once quantum physics enters the equation, “all bets are still off,” according to Barbour. Time could be “more like a fountain where you have lots of pairs of springs. Or just a whole host of springs flowing out of a fountain in different directions.” …scientific explorer.”
“Because the laws of physics are invariant”….astrophysicists must create a fantasyland in which neutrinos spin right.
Let us follow the invariant laws of Physics; if we do that, we must come to the conclusion that this universe, the one in which we live, the one with left spinning neutrinos, should not exist.
CERN is the European Organization for Nuclear research, it operates the largest particle physics laboratory in the world at the Swiss/French border.
It was CERN that discovered the Higgs Boson-the God Particle.
“One of the great mysteries of modern physics is why antimatter did not destroy the Universe at the beginning of time.
….All of our observations find a complete symmetry between matter and antimatter, which is why the universe should not actually exist,” says Christian Smorra, a physicist at CERN’s Baryon–Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment (BASE) collaboration.
“An asymmetry must exist here somewhere but we simply do not understand where the difference is.”….The standard model predicts the Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter – but that’s a combustive mixture that would have annihilated itself, leaving nothing behind to make galaxies or planets or people….cosmosmagazine.”
Readers, Science, Physics, astrophysicists, and cosmologists are on the verge of proving the Universe, and Mankind SHOULD NOT EXIST.
But the Universe does exist.
CERN makes a case that the anti-universe should not exist because this universe should not exist; no universe should exist “ Because the laws of physics are invariant”
"Time is not something that pre-exists".....This Blogger believes that God created Time, and left spinning neutronics, aging and Death.
Death is a manifestation of the existence of God. If the Universe was created by natural forces, there would be no need for Death. It would all be static, without forces of Change, or Entropy. Entropy and Death are Creations of God. All things die: men, trees, dinosaurs, even rocks. If one leaves a rock in the wind and rain; it too will die.
Why did God need Death? Simple, for Death is Change, or as Tolstoy noted: Change is proof of God.
Death is the currency of God, for it brings Change; and God seemingly likes change. He likes Change, not Progress, for Change can also be Entropy. It is the Artist in Him. Death is Creative Destruction at its highest level. That is the invariant law of physics.
Comments
Post a Comment