Skip to main content

Astrophysical Priests Go In Search of Right Spinning Neutrinos, and Time Going Backwards,; Conjure Up an Anti- Universe

This Blogger has a special affection for the concept of TIME; he became a fervent Believer in Divinity while reading Stephen Hawking’s A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME. In explaining the creation of the Universe, Astrophysicist Stephen Hawking asked his Readers to imagine a time, before the Big Bang, without Time, a Time before Time, a Time without Time. 

In reading Hawking’s request, this Blogger came to the conclusion that Astrophysics was a Holy Text; a Belief System wrapped in transitory Science; a Holy Text on par with the Torah, the Old Testament, the Koran, the New Testament, or the Mahabharata. If anyone can imagine a time before Time, without Time, one can reasonably believe that a whale swallowed Jonah. 

If one can believe in a Time without Time, one can easily believe in God. For it can be argued that God invented Time; for if TIME was a natural phenomenon, Mankind could go both back in time, and forward in time; physics tells us that should be possible. But against the laws of physics, Time is an arrow, going only one way- forward. If one built a time machine in 2022, one could go to the year 2050; but the Time Traveler would not be able to return to 2022. Time goes against physics, and anything which goes against the natural laws of physics is Divine. 

The scientific fact that Time is Time, and only goes one way, forward and not backwards has greatly discombulated astrophysicists; for Time going only forward goes against physics itself. 

In 2022, astrophysicists, being the scientific priests that they are, and not the scientists they should be, have solved that problem. By inventing another universe, in which Time goes backward. 

In college one learned that recorded History was divided into BC(Before Christ) and AD( after Christ’s Death). Caesar lived in a time frame going backwards; he was born in 100 BC and was slain in 44 BC. Whereas, Abraham Lincoln lived going forward, born in 1809; slain in 1865. 

In the new universe speculated on, everything goes backwards. 

It is an anti-universe; where time runs backwards. 

“…The researchers think that there was a ‘backwards universe’ before the Big Bang that was then inverted to create the universe we live in today. They explained: “….“The universe before the bang and the universe after the bang may be viewed as a universe/anti-universe pair, emerging directly into the hot, radiation-dominated era we observe in our past. 

“This, in turn, leads to a remarkably economical explanation of the cosmological dark matter.” ….The scientists propose dark matter is actually made up of a type of ghostly particle called right-handed neutrinos. 

Neutrino particles are present in our universe but they only spin to the left. Scientists think it’s odd that they haven’t found a version that spins to the right as the laws of physics suggest they should be out there. 

The researchers think the right spinning particles could be invisible in our universe and could just be represented by dark matter. Little is known about dark matter in the universe other than it can not be seen but does have a physical effect on other objects…..popular mechanics.com” 

Where are the right-handed neutrinos? Where is Time flowing backwards? Where is dark matter seen? In the anti-universe of course. 

In recorded History, there have been personages who have had near death experiences; in those experiences, they have seen Heaven. No one has ever seen the anti-universe, full of right spinning neutrinos. Which begs the question- which is more plausible to believe in Heaven or an anti-universe? 

“All of us experience time moving forward — we age, and have memories from the past, but no idea what will happen in the future.  However, nothing in the laws of physics asserts that time must move forward. 

Is it possible that there exists a place where time actually moves backwards?  In theory, yes, in what are called mirror universes.   

To understand why time seems to only move in one direction, many physicists believe it comes down to entropy, the level of molecular disorder in a system, which is always increasing.   

However, two separate groups of physicists are working on models that look at how the initial conditions, such as the Big Bang, might have created the arrow of time, and remarkably, both show time moving in two different directions. 

The Big Bang created our universe, it may have also created a mirror universe where time moves in the opposite direction.  So from our perspective, time in this parallel universe moves backwards.  However, anyone in the parallel universe would perceive our universe’s time as moving backwards.  

The first model, published just over a year ago in Physical Review Letters, states that one of the implications of Newton’s theory of gravity creates the conditions for time to move in a certain direction.   

Julian Barbour from the University of Oxford, Tim Koslowski from the University of New Brunswick, and Flavio Mercati from the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics argue that for any confined system of particles — for example, a self-contained universe, not affected by anything outside of it, like ours — gravity will create a point when the distance between particles is minimal. 

And when the particles begin to expand outwards, they will do so in two different directions.  Barbour and his colleagues created a simple 1,000 particle point model of the universe showing this dual expansion, with gravity creating structure in both directions. 

The moment before the expansion is called the Janus point.  “Time is not something that pre-exists,” Barbour told Quartz.  “The direction and flow of time we have to deduce from what’s happening in the universe. When we look at it that way, it’s natural to say that time begins at that central point and flows away in opposite directions.” 

…..fortunately, even though time could be flowing in different directions, we will probably never be able to experience the reverse.  “We’re on one side of the Janus point,” Mercati told Quartz.  “On one side you get your arrow of time and can never experience the other one. It’s in your past.” 

According to New Scientist, two other physicists, Sean Carroll from California Institute of Technology in Pasadena and Alan Guth from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, created a similar model that shows time moving in two different directions, in two parallel universes, from the Big Bang. 

….“We call it the two-headed arrow of time,” Guth told New Scientist.  “Because the laws of physics are invariant, we see exactly the same thing in the other direction.” 

This theory is still far from widely accepted, but it is based on classical physics. Once quantum physics enters the equation, “all bets are still off,” according to Barbour.  Time could be “more like a fountain where you have lots of pairs of springs. Or just a whole host of springs flowing out of a fountain in different directions.” …scientific explorer.” 

“Because the laws of physics are invariant”….astrophysicists must create a fantasyland in which neutrinos spin right. 

Let us follow the invariant laws of Physics; if we do that, we must come to the conclusion that this universe, the one in which we live, the one with left spinning neutrinos, should not exist.

CERN is the European Organization for Nuclear research, it operates the largest particle physics laboratory in the world at the Swiss/French border.

It was CERN that discovered the Higgs Boson-the God Particle. 

“One of the great mysteries of modern physics is why antimatter did not destroy the Universe at the beginning of time. 

 

….All  of our observations find a complete symmetry between matter and antimatter, which is why the universe should not actually exist,” says Christian Smorra, a physicist at CERN’s Baryon–Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment (BASE) collaboration.  

 

“An asymmetry must exist here somewhere but we simply do not understand where the difference is.”….The standard model predicts the Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter – but that’s a combustive mixture that would have annihilated itself, leaving nothing behind to make galaxies or planets or people….cosmosmagazine.” 

 

Readers, Science, Physics, astrophysicists,  and cosmologists are on the verge of proving the Universe, and Mankind SHOULD NOT EXIST. 


But the Universe does exist. 


CERN makes a case that the anti-universe should not exist because this universe should not exist; no universe should exist “ Because the laws of physics are invariant” 


This Blogger can explain the existence of this Universe as a Divine miracle; can or will the Researchers explain the anti-Universe as another miracle?


But then again, why would God, the God we know, create an anti-Universe, with backward time and certainly backward evolution.? To see worshipful Mankind devolve into trilobites? Trilobites are cute but they never raise cathedrals or temples to God nor write AMAZING GRACE, nor sing NEARER MY GOD TO THEE as they drown. Trilobites are not that interesting compared to Mankind.


"Time is not something that pre-exists".....This Blogger believes that God created Time, and left spinning neutronics, aging and Death. 

Death is a manifestation of the existence of God. If the Universe  was created by natural forces, there would be no need for Death. It would all be static, without forces of Change, or Entropy. Entropy and Death are Creations of God. All things die: men, trees, dinosaurs, even rocks. If one leaves a rock in the wind and rain; it too will die. 

Why did God need Death? Simple, for Death is Change, or as  Tolstoy noted: Change is proof of God. 

Death is the currency of God, for it brings Change; and God seemingly likes change. He likes Change, not Progress, for Change can also be Entropy. It is the Artist in Him. Death is Creative Destruction at its highest level. That is the invariant law of physics. 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Urination Of Nicole Kidman's Career

I went to see EYES WIDE SHUT in total awe of its Director, Stanley Kubrick, who had in his career Directed THE GREATEST Science Fiction/Cosmological film EVER- 2001, SPACE ODYSSEY, the BEST and MOST INSIGHTFUL film essay on American culture EVER- LOLITA, arguably the greatest war movie ever- PATHS OF GLORY, and one of the best film epics ever- SPARTACUS. Mr. Kubrick died SUDDENLY, before EYES WIDE SHUT was released. Everyone was so sad. Then I saw EYES WIDE SHUT, and understood exactly why Herr Director Kubrick had croaked so suddenly; he had willed himself to death before the release of the film, so that  he would not have to suffer the slings and shots against his declining genius. EYES WIDE SHUT is the WORST, laughably worst, porn film ever made, EVER. It starred that larger than life couple(at the time), Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman. The key scene in the film was Ms. Kidman peeing. I was spending over $60.00(including tickets,parking and snacks for me and my date ) to watch

The Crash of Flight 447: Fate, Moliere and Veronique Gaignard

In 1954 there was the film, THE HIGH AND THE MIGHTY about danger in the air; that was followed by the 1964 film, FATE IS THE HUNTER about a fatal airplane crash and the followup investigation; followed by the 1970 film, AIRPORT, about a bomber on a plane, starring every living star in Hollywood at the time; followed by  the sequels, AIRPORT 75, AIRPORT 77, AIRPORT 79- THE CONCORDE. All that melodramatic danger in the air was laughed to death by the films AIRPLANE in 1980, followed by AIRPLANE II in 1982. Everything in air flight had been covered, both the tragedy and the comedy  of air travel, until Air France Flight 447. Flight 447 was the Air France  Airbus Flight from Brazil to France, which,in 2009, crashed in the South Atlantic , killing all on board,228 passengers. Airbuses fly by wire, which means they fly by computers rather than the old mechanical ways.  Very up to date, except when something goes awry, then it seems it is very difficult to set right. In the wee hours

Roger Cohen's Russian Think Piece in NEW YORK TIMES Begs the Question: Was Gerry Maxey Right about Russia TEN YEARS AGO?

  This Blogger respects Russians; as Frederick the Great stated :” It takes two bullets to take a Russian soldier out; one to kill him and one to  stop him.” This Blogger   likes Russians; even though once, in Moscow, during the Soviet era, his incredibly attractive tour guide, aka KGB agent, told him and his brother   that they were in danger of being hit, fatally, by a Soviet car crossing a Moscow street. T his Blogger’s brother told her that he had ridden in a Soviet Car, the LADA; and that he could damn well survive any hit by that piece of junk. She laughed. That night, this Blogger’s brother slept in his room, under his bed, drunk. This Blogger admires the way Russians do business; when Soviet diplomats were kidnapped in Lebanon, the KGB paid the ransoms immediately, without complaint. Shortly thereafter, Beirut was flooded with Soviet agents and Soviet bribes; the kidnappers were identified. They were abducted, tortured and  castrated; their dead bodies strung from l