President Obama's Three Biggest JUNGIAN Mistakes

This Blogger receives a substantial number of emails asking him to address and rank President Obama’s policy mistakes. Let me assure those Readers, there is plenty of time for that before the next Presidential Election. Let us instead address President Obama’s three major Jungian Mistakes, which crippled his Leadership capability, and Leadership projection.

America’s adversaries are led by men who could have risen to power and leadership in any age in recorded history. Not so with President Obama, his rise to power is specific to feminized Millennial America.

Why?

Because president Obama is the most feminized President in American History, and after Trump, or Cruz or Clinton is elected President, he will still remain the most feminized President in American History.

On September 23, 2013; this Blogger published this Blog: Russian Speculation about What President Putin REALLY Thinks of President Obama’s Masculine Spirituality....http://themaxeychronicles.blogspot.com/2013/09/russian-speculation-about-what.html.

The Blog memorialized my meal with Gleb (his nom de guerre), a former Russian KGB agent.

The following is excerpted from that Blog: “He informed me that psychological profiles were done on all foreign leaders, and thus one was done on President Obama, but he could not tell me the results even if he knew them. But he did say that he had done a personal psychological profile on President Obama and that if his conclusions coincided with the Russian government’s profile, or President Putin’s profile, sobeit……

“Gerry, your President lacks masculine spirituality….. many men, and most leaders would like to have accompanied Sir Francis Drake on his voyage around the world, discovered lost cities of gold, joined the Lewis and Clark Corps of Discovery, dived with Cousteau, or stepped on the moon with Armstrong. Many men have the masculine spirituality of adventure, your President does not. But that alone does not separate him from other men. As you watch him, you see that he loves official comfort, the office, the convention, the meeting, the salon, the classroom, the seminar, the friendly confines of a couch….I sincerely doubt if he has ever dreamed of mastering the Cape, conquering the steppes, crossing the plains, taming the tundra.  He has never dreamed of testing himself against the wild will of Nature, as most men do.

Though many men have the masculine spirituality of adventure, circumstances preclude them from adventure……but why your President is an outlier is that he not only does not want to go on any adventure, he does not envy those who do. Your President does not even envy those men who have the masculine spirituality of adventure. Your President does not envy those men who have done adventurous things.

I submit that half of the men in America and most Republicans, men and women, have a difficult time following the leadership of a man without the masculine spirituality of adventure….. Obama can only discern what other men will do from the advice of the women around him, his mother, wife, Oprah, Samantha Power, Susan Rice, and Valerie Jarrett.

Because Obama so identifies with the feminine viewpoint of men, he     sees other men as bullies or aggressors or insensitive slobs, like women do.  Obama is incapable of seeing men as fellow hunters, fellow warriors, or fellow companions; like women, he sees men as inconveniences to civilization.

Obama sees Republicans as a woman would view her loathed, boring ex-husband. Obama sees Republicans as vain males, benighted ex- husbands trying to spoil his current happiness by sheer meanness.

In turn, Republicans see Obama not as the President but as the shrew of an ex-wife who has no understanding of the pride of men. ….Obama is afraid of the wilderness in the hearts of men, the anti-Lermontov. I never could find out what Obama’s favorite novel is, Clinton’s was ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SOLITUDE  but I will bet it is not Conrad’s HEART OF DARKNESS….Conrad would terrify Obama. ….THE MAXEY CHRONICLES.”

Gleb’s insights made a resounding comeback last week, when President Obama announced his favorite novel of 2015, FATES and FURIES by Lauren Groff.

“President Obama’s favorite book of 2015  wasn't policy analysis or political history, he tells PEOPLE magazine. The president's favorite book of the year was a novel, "Fates and Furies" by Lauren Groff. Los Angeles Times.,….”

In 2015, the Republic is in conflict with Russia over Ukraine, and the President is not reading TARAS BULBA by Gogol; in 2015 the Republic is at risk because of the situation in the Middle East and he is not reading SEVEN PILLARS OF WISDOM by T.E. Lawrence; in 2015, the Republic is at risk because of the fanaticism of Sunni Muslims, and the President is not reading THE RIVER WAR by Winston Churchill.

In 2015, with the Republic at risk from all sides, the president is spending his time on a book suited for LIFETIME.

“A strange thing happens when Lauren Groff’s male readers talk to her about her latest novel, “Fates and Furies”: They want to tell her how lousy men are.“Even really sensitive guys sort of look me dead in the face and say, ‘You’re right. Men really are terrible people’…. says Groff…..LANCASTER ONLINE.”

The following is from the NEW YORK TIMES’ review of FATE and FURIES. This Blogger has highlighted the parts pertinent to understand President Obama.

“…... Coming from Ms. Groff, this book far more artificial than the stunning …..

“Fates and Furies”… much more manipulative and even conventional book….. It can also be florid and odd. (“Hot milk of a world, with its skin of morning fog in the window.”)  NEW YORK TIMES.”

That is how most male Reaganites see President Obama: manipulative, florid and odd.

Because President Obama is a feminized, odd male, he does not understand the importance of symbolism to non- odd males. There is a Jungian reason men will die for Regimental colors but not new kitchens.

President Obama has made three inglorious symbolic mistakes, of Jungian proportions since assuming power.

ACCEPTING THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE IN 2009-

Nothing damaged President Obama’s Jungian leadership capability and potential more than accepting the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009. “The 2009 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Obama for his "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between people…."new climate" in international relations fostered by Obama, especially in reaching out to the Muslim world."

Obama accepted the prize in Oslo on December 10, 2009.”

Accepting the Peace Prize was a crucial, perhaps fatal mistake by the President to his Presidency; that act evaporated all esteem, and goodwill in his fellow males, especially his male adversaries or opponents.

Why?

Because every male in the world knew, in is Jungian heart, that President Obama DID NOT DESERVE THE PEACE PRIZE. The Prize, every male knew, was an Affirmative Action sop to a florid and odd President.  When he accepted, in an instance, he transformed himself into an Affirmative Action Laureate, inconsequential.

In 2015, even the very Norwegians who bestowed the sop on him are regretful: “The former director of Norway’s Nobel Institute revealed this week that he regrets the committee’s decision to give the 2009 Nobel Peace award to President Obama.

Geil Lundestad, director at the institute for 25 years, said in his just-published memoir that he and the committee had unanimously decided to grant the award to Mr. Obama just after his election in 2009 more in hopes of aiding the American president to achieve his goals on nuclear disarmament, rather than in recognition of what Mr. Obama had already accomplished. ….

“[We] thought it would strengthen Obama and it didn’t have this effect,” he (Lundestad) told the Associated Press in an interview….. In the book, he expressed regret that the decision had been based in a hope for the future rather than recognition of past accomplishments, and that their expectations for Mr. Obama were not fulfilled….BBC.”

One can only imagine the global respect Mr. Obama could have instantly achieved if he had turned down the Nobel Peace Prize, because the whole world knew he  did not deserve it, that it was an Affirmative Action sop. The world would have declaimed: Hosanna, a man of integrity.

Instead he took it, even though it was not deserved, because it was given.

Why did he do it? 

Because the florid Mr. Obama, the gaudy show horse could not pass up the opportunity to be seen.

Did he need the money, the $1 Million in prize money?

He could have made $50 million in royalties from a specific book about his thought processes in turning down the Prize.

In taking the Prize Money, President Obama tipped his Jungian hand. He likes money above integrity.

And world leaders noticed.

“… throughout 2014, Saudi King Abdullah and top kingdom officials spent a fortune on gifts for Obama, first lady Michelle Obama and their daughters — roughly $1.35 million…..AP.”

By law, neither the President nor Michelle nor the First Daughters may keep the gifts…..so technically, the lavish Saudi gifts are not bribes…but the gifts are tells, from a wicked despotism that spots someone who values money over integrity. The magnificence of the gifts is a signal to President Obama; think how much we will give you AFTER your Presidency if your Presidency pleases us.

President left his moral authority on the stage in Oslo when he accepted that undeserved Peace Prize; it wrecked him in the esteem of males everywhere. It was an irretrievable, irredeemable and irrevocable Jungian mistake.

THE SESQUICENTENNIAL AMERICAN CIVIL WAR SNUBS-

American Liberals take umbrage at American conservative white males because, Liberals say, those males believe that President Obama is “foreign.”

By historical irony, between 2011 through 2015, President Obama presided over the 150^th Anniversary of the American Civil War (1861-1865), from the first shot fired at Fort Sumter, to Lee’s surrender at Appomattox.

This was the time to reconcile with conservative white males, by attending some of the commemorations, to show that he understood the Jungian Blood Memory significance of the Civil War through his white American mother.

Instead the President made a Jungian mistake; he SNUBBED all the events, thereby symbolically informing conservative white males he was indeed a foreigner, if not legally then in spirit.

He even snubbed the 150^th Anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg, the greatest clash of arms on American soil, to go to Africa, his father's home continent. That is total Jungian symbolism.

On July 1, 2013, this Blogger published: President Obama Goes To Africa Snubs the 150th Anniversary of The Battle of Gettysburg (July 1-3)….http://themaxeychronicles.blogspot.com/2013/07/president-obama-goes-to-africa-snubs.html.

The following is excerpted from that Blog:

"This is the 150^th Anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg, the greatest, most Homeric, most important, bloodiest battle ever fought on American soil…..It is a seminal event in American history. …..

……The United States, in 2013, is a nation divided by class,  Globalization, Women’s Aspirations, Abortion, Gay Rights, Voting Rights, Immigration; the sacred and hallowed ground of Gettysburg, on this 150^th Anniversary, would be the perfect, nay pluperfect, place to begin a national reconciliation by noting the common bondage of blood sacrifice we have as Americans. Nothing current and nothing going forward can be worst than what the men of both sides endured on the Battlefield of Gettysburg.

This is the time, the 150^th Anniversary, and the Gettysburg Battlefield is the hallowed place for our American President to say that, as Americans, we must never hold enmity in our hearts for other Americans, and never contemplate another Civil War.

Alas, our President is not here in the United States taking advantage of this natural period of reconciliation. …...He is in Africa, in this time frame, because he has nothing to give to American reconciliation. He is a petty triumphalist, who has deserted his nation when it needs a commemorative reconciliation…..THE MAXEY CHRONICLES.”

President Obama, after being begged, also rejected attending the 150^th Anniversary of Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, the greatest speech in American History.

How can anyone NOT consider President Obama a foreigner when he does not celebrate a single event of the greatest Homeric saga in American History?

LACK OF JUNGIAN MASCULINE MAGNANIMITY-

When Lincoln met Grant and Sherman to map out the final strategy to snuff out the Confederacy, Sherman asked him:”How should I treat the Rebs when they are beaten.”

Lincoln replied in terms all men recognize:”Let them up easy.”

The implication was obvious to Sherman; the Rebs were beaten but still Americans.

One of the great masculine attributes is Jungian Masculine Magnanimity; that is, which of your current enemies or adversaries should be run down to ground and eliminated (like ISIS) and which enemy or adversary can be reconciled by a Lincolnesque magnanimity.

In 2009, President Obama won a great victory over Republicans by extraordinary legislative means, OBAMACARE.

At the signing of the bill into law, President Obama surrounded himself with every functionary of the Democratic Party alive. No Republican thought it was prudent or appropriate to attend.

President Obama should have known that he would need Republicans again, for the obvious reason, Republicans are Americans and Americans need other Americans.

In that moment of stunning triumph, President Obama should have let the Republicans up easy.

But he was incapable of that; his Jungian soul was and is the QUEEN OF HEARTS, feminine triumphalism.

For a century, American presidents have fought to bring Healthcare to Americans; two of the greatest knights in that quest were Teddy Roosevelt and Richard Nixon.

President Obama did not mention either when he cataloged the Presidents who have fought for Healthcare; he only mentioned Democratic presidents.

At that moment he was the character  SYLVIA from Claire Boothe Luce’s play, THE WOMEN, “…., assertive, disloyal, dishonest, inconsiderate, selfish.”

The deliberate omission of Richard Nixon at the ceremony was especially egregious to all those who appreciate the History of America. In 1974, President Nixon offered a healthcare plan, arguably better than OBAMACARE. Republicans lined up behind it; it would have passed but Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy torpedoed it, for vanity.

Healthcare reform for Nixon was personal; he had grown up poor in California, losing two brothers, Harold and Arthur, to tuberculosis because his family could not afford proper healthcare.

Any man of masculine magnanimity, would have made the gesture and mentioned Richard Nixon at the healthcare signing,letting Nixon's ghost up easy.

Instead the President reverted to feminine form, and became EVE HARRINGTON in his moment of triumph.

In the end, Obama’s Three Jungian mistakes have highlighted that it is ALL ABOUT OBAMA for America’s feminized President; which has caused an unyielding Jungian backlash of ferocity from males especially conservative males.