Recently this Blogger published a warning against the Globalist/Liberal/Democratic Agenda:99 Reasons to Vote Against Trump; Maybe One Billion and 1 to Vote for Him...............................https://themaxeychronicles.blogspot.com/2020/09/99-reasons-to-vote-against-trumpmaybe.html.
In that Blog, this Blogger posited his position that Globalists were/are intent on making America the dumping ground for the entire excess population of nations incapable of birthrate moderation. The Globalist reaction was profound and profane; this Blogger was called a racist, a troglodyte, a Fascist, a xenophobe and a fool…..and those were the polite Globalist comments.
Fortunately, for this Blogger’s reputation, Globalists take pride in their agenda of transforming America into an over populated, water stressed, famine ridden desertification of a country.
One of the best and brightest Globalist apparatchiks in the media is Matt Yglesias, a co-founder of the news site VOX. He has just published a tome, ONE BILLION AMERICANS, in which he proudly proclaims that America should keep intaking people until there are one billion Americans.
In 2015, this Blogger elucidated an immigration policy he named RUTHLESS COMPASSION; a policy to limit immigration so that America will survive when it has to exist on depleted sources of drinking water. Mr. Yglesias calls his immigration policy, RUTHLES PRAGMATISM. It is based on the belief that there is a magic wand which creates fresh drinking water.
In raw terms, the American Dream is not based on the entrepreneurship of its immigrant population, but on the abundance of fresh water, and the abundance of food; which is a by-product of an abundance of fresh water.
It both amazes and disturbs this Blogger than none of the glib Globalists on MSNBC, VOX or other Globalist media outlets has any American Blood Memory of when America did not have abundant water, the DUST BOWL.
“….American place in water jeopardy is the High Plains, which sits on top of an aquifer called the Ogallala. The Ogallala is sometimes described as an ocean of groundwater. One of the largest known aquifers in the world, it runs from South Dakota to Texas, more or less in the shape of a monkey wrench. Near the top, in places, it is a thousand feet deep, and at the lower end, in places, there are areas where it is as shallow as only a few feet. The Dust Bowl, which played out above the Ogallala….For decades farmers thought the Ogallala was inexhaustible. According to Scientific American, drawing on government studies, by 1975 the amount of water taken each year from the aquifer equaled the flow of the Colorado River, and now the annual draw is about eighteen times that amount. Farmers have been pumping out four to six feet a year in places where half an inch is being added. As far as continuing to be useful, the Ogallala might be exhausted by 2070. A reasonable estimate is that it would take six thousand years for rain to replenish it….…..ESQUIRE.
Liberal Guru Michael Moore once said America could take in millions more people, for it was a vast land. Well, the Sahara is a vaster land, a land which cannot support people because it has no water above ground, nor below ground.
To empty the Ogallala means desertification of America’s breadbasket; ONE BLIION AMERICANS will empty the Ogallala really fast.
Why do Globalists/Liberals/Democrats see migrants as a good thing for America? Because they do not see migrants as thirsty people; they see migrants as potential servants, voters, consumers, DISNEYLAND visitors....commodities.
One billion Americans would be catastrophic in unimaginable ways.
If one thinks that the American justice system and policing are bad now, with a population of 330 million, wait until there is one billion Americans. The judicial system will be over whelmed, and consequently, every cemetery in America will have a section assigned for victims of extrajudicial killings. Extrajudicial killings will be the only effective method that American police forces will have to maintain order in a population of ONE BILLION people.
Ghettoes and barrios will be turned into PERMANENT FAVELAS.
All American cities, regardless of size, will take on the look and feel of Calcutta.
Public transit will collapse from overuse.
If one thinks that there are too many food deserts in America today; with one billion people, the entire nation will be a food desert. Famine will lead to social disorder.
If one thinks that the American educational system is bad with 330 inhabitants, it will be entropic with one billion inhabitants.
The Globalists, the Liberals, the Democrats WANT an America of one billion, for they see migrants as potential Democratic voters; voters who will allow Globalists to keep their limousines, perks, and continue their indulgence in mad social experiments.
The following is excerpted from Mr. Yglesias’ interview with BUSINESS INSIDER.
“He's also the author of the new book, "One Billion Americans: The Case for Thinking Bigger," in which he argues for massively increasing the population as the best method to maintain global economic dominance and keep China from overtaking the US.
Yglesias spoke this week by phone with Business Insider columnist Anthony Fisher about new approaches to immigration, using the government to encourage larger families….
Anthony Fisher: More than anything, the book feels like a policy argument in favor of mass immigration. There's a lot of stuff about encouraging procreation through increasing family benefits, but what's the elevator pitch for adding 700 million Americans?
Matt Yglesias: The United States is increasingly engaged in a kind of international competition with China. Politicians in both major parties are talking about it.And if you ask yourself, "Why is China a major force on the international stage?," it's primarily because their population is so much larger than ours.
The elevator pitch of the book is, we should try to close that gap, and we should close it by both of the major means available. By doing more to support parents and children here at home and by doing more to accept immigrants from around the world.
There are some questions raised downstream about housing and transportation, and the book is about going through those and showing how we could deal with those problems and emerge, not just as a stronger country in the aggregate, but also a richer, more prosperous, and, in a lot of ways, a more fulfilling country.
Fisher: Why is being a global economic power so closely tied to population?
Yglesias: The Chinese market has grown larger than ours. People can have a wonky debate about purchasing power parity and exchange rates. But I was really struck by a controversy about an NBA executive who tweeted support for the Hong Kong protests. Suddenly the whole league came down on him like a ton of bricks because the China market is so important to the league.
A week or two ago, PEN America came out with a report about how Chinese censors no longer block which movies can be shown in the People's Republic. The China market is so large that Hollywood censors its own movies in accordance with Chinese demands and then shows those censored movies here in the United States.
These are sort of small things. I mean, we're talking movies and basketball. But they go to show that the philosophy of engagement and economic integration with China — that this will all be fine — has really not worked out. Even if you don't posit terrible military confrontations or things like that, the sheer scale of the Chinese economy creates a problem for basic American values.
And being No. 1 matters. Just the extent to which our soft power is suffering from the lack of scale is something that is becoming apparent to more and more of us over the past couple of years.
....Fisher: Mass immigration is controversial, especially in the age of Trump, and immigrants are often scapegoated for driving down the wages of low-skilled workers. Even if the data shows that it's only a short-term effect, how do you convince the low-skilled worker they should support mass immigration because it'll work out for them in the long term?
….Yglesias: I'm arguing for ruthless pragmatism on immigration. My read on the situation is that even unskilled immigrants are actually quite beneficial on net.I'm incredibly favorable to immigration, but the political reality is the public is just more skeptical of immigration than they should be. I hope if people read this book, you'll learn a lot about all different kinds of studies, maybe change your mind and think immigration is great. ….
Fisher: To be clear, I'm very pro-immigration myself on a policy level. But I often stumble on this argument, because the data says, in the short term, wages could be driven down for native-born Americans by low-skilled immigrant labor coming into the market.
For people looking only at their next paycheck, they don't care about the long-term economic growth of the country. How do you convince them that this thing is only temporary and it won't hurt them in the long run?
Yglesias: It might be necessary, as part of the compromise, to sort of pump the brakes on less-skilled immigration. Unskilled, low-skilled immigration has fallen a lot because there's much less unauthorized immigration. It's not totally clear to me how much people's views of this are driven by reality.
……But we should be setting the goal of a larger legal flow of people.
Fisher: You wrote that tripling the population in the lower 48 states would still leave the continental US about half as dense as Germany. But that assumes the population won't just cluster around a few areas. Why would a billion Americans not just create a few hyper-dense supercities, like a bunch of Shanghais?
Yglesias: It might. …BUSINESS INSIDER.”
Harvard Graduate Yglesias has cachet among America's Globalist Elite; so much the worse for America.
The following is excerpted from Mr. Yglesias book:
“The United States is not “full.” In fact, it is empty. Right now, the country has about 93 people per square mile. Many, many countries are far denser than this, and not just city-states like Singapore (more than 20,000 per square mile) or small island nations like Malta (3,913 per square mile). South Korea has 1,337 people per square mile, and Belgium has 976. If you tripled the population of the United States, adding the new Americans only to the Lower 48 and leaving Alaska and Hawaii intact and unchanged, the main part of America would be only about as dense as France and less than half as dense as Germany.
A transformation on that scale is almost impossible to imagine, in large part because the American political system has fallen into a state of torpor and dysfunction driven by, among other things, the absence of the shared sense of purpose that once bound the national experiment….. the biggest opportunity in a generation for new ideas to take hold. So here is one big one: a billion Americans.
When America faced down Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, we were the big dog. We had more people, more wealth, and more industrial capacity. (Back in 1938, the gross domestic product of the U.S. alone was larger than that of Germany, Japan, and Italy combined.) But against China, we are the little dog: There are more than 1 billion of them to about 330 million of us. …..Conservatives argue that the country can’t take more immigrants — that it should effectively close its borders or, at the very least, restrict immigration to a trickle. Progressives tend to disagree, even while being inclined to say that the particular towns and cities they live in should be preserved as is, opposing any further real-estate development as a pernicious disruption. Meanwhile, America’s birthrate has slipped to a historic low, and nobody in the political mainstream seems to think we can or should do anything about it. But a three-to-one advantage in population is really hard to overcome. Thankfully, tripling the size of the nation is something that is in our power to achieve. It would just require more immigrants….Of course, if we had a lot more people, we’d need to adjust a number of other things to make sure they had jobs and places to live. Housing shortages are common in many parts of the country, but the tools to surmount them are easily available and — like immigration — would cost taxpayers nothing…...
These challenges may seem complicated, but really they are not. The solution to America’s new urban-housing crisis is to build more houses so more people can move to in-demand cities.The solution to the illegal immigration crisis is to let more people come legally. Immigrants of virtually all stripes may look like a threat to some xenophobic Americans, but they make native-born Americans richer and fuel the kinds of innovation that can help the country grow. Both America’s vast rural hinterland and many of its aging northeastern and midwestern cities need an influx of people to prevent their current priceless assets (i.e., their real estate) from wasting away over the next generation.
….one advantage the U.S. does have over China is that because it is a beacon of freedom to the world, rather than an increasingly dystopian oligarchy, there are more than 100 million people who would like to move here than America is prepared to allow in……. We should be reasonably selective about whom we let in, but we should let in a lot of people.
Of course, tripling the population could also cause a number of problems. Traffic jams could get worse. Rent could go up. Water access would be stretched thinner. There’d be more pollution. These are, unfortunately, real concerns.…….MATT YGLESIAS.”
That is why Globalists, Liberals and Democrats are unfit to govern in the 21st Century; they consider a traffic jam on the same level of inconvenience as drought. Oh excuse this Blogger...."water access would be stretched thinner.'
All the Democratic/Liberal/Globalist criticism of the Trump Administration is White Noise in comparison to the funeral dirge they are planning for the American civilization, and the American people.
A vote for Biden/Harris may indeed further Diversity or Open Borders, but it will lessen the chances of survival of American Civilization in the 21st Century.
On June 23, 2015, this Blogger published his essay on RUTHLESS COMPASSION, as opposed to ruthless pragmatism.
The following is excerpted from that Blog:
“Pope Francis just did a term paper on Climate Change, and in that tome, his Liberalism trumped his smarts. He railed, in discreet Papal fashion, against the sin of Man-made Climate Change, but disavowed the theory that Man-made Climate Change could be caused by overpopulation; and that over- population could be remedied by war, famine, epidemic, abortion, eugenics or birth control.
Pope Francis indulged in the Liberal Anthropocene Oxymoron; that Climate Change has nothing whatsoever to do with overpopulation.
Liberals refuse to believe the science they worship (the Anthropocene Oxymoron); for if they did believe the science of Climate Change, they would acknowledge that all the emissions, all the sewage, all the warming of the planet which is creating drought, is caused by too many people drinking God’s water, eating at God’s trough, and proliferating the usage of God’s fossil fuels.
Pope Francis issued a 184 page encyclical (Papal Letter) on Climate Change, titled "Laudato Si," or "Praise Be", blaming climate change on developed countries, which are, because they are developed countries ,wicked by definition, Jesuit thinking.
The Pope asked richer nations to upscale their assistance to poorer, over populated nations minus easy access to birth control…...This Blogger believes the Pope has a responsibility to prioritize Anthropocene threats to God’s Earth. Gas Emissions are a threat, but the BIGGEST Threat to Mankind on this planet is LACK OF FRESH WATER.
“More than a third of the largest groundwater basins in the world are being depleted faster than they are getting replenished…… researchers said the world's groundwater reserves are probably far smaller than previously thought.....Los Angeles Times.”\
Because of overpopulation, the planet Earth is running out of water, and in the midst of the Anthropocene crisis, the Jesuit Pope is worried about the developed nations paying a nebulous debt to poorer nations. The Anthropocene is not about Social Justice, BUT WATER, or more accurately, the LACK OF DRINKING WATER.
........ It is NOT elegant to die of thirst; some men have killed themselves rather than die of thirst. When this Blogger was in Egypt, an Arab Guardian told him that men who are dying of thirst in the desert, sweat blood. Sweating blood is not elegant.
…. “Civilizations in the past have had to migrate out of areas of drought. We may have to migrate people out of California.” ..Lynne Wilson, who serves on the climate change delegation in the United Nations…..businessinsider”.
The United Nations is drawing up contingency plans to evacuate Southern California by mid 21st Century (Readers, that is just 35 years from now)because Civilization will not be able to exist in California with so many people and so little water.
….To save Civilization itself, the Anthropocene will demand a ruthless compassion.
…..If the Republic does not exercise Ruthless Compassion now, ....in order to manage our dwindling fresh water resources, then by 2050, Civilization will break down because of Anthropocene desertification. People’s lives will mean nothing; and Civilization itself will evacuate from Southern California.
To lead his flock through the perils of the Athropocene, Pope Francis should do another encyclical, Immitis Miserationes (Latin for Ruthless Compassion)….THE MAXEY CHRONICLES.”
Comments
Post a Comment