In
the archives of the oral history of World War II, there is a very seminal interview
pertinent to the current 2018 border
conditions.
This campaign to demagnetize America as an attractive destination for the millions of migrants has caused and will cause cruel and inhumane acts
… until the United States caps a ceiling on its population, which it must do to survive this era of Climate Change, it must do inhumane acts to make migration to America unattractive…THE MAXEY CHRONICLES.”
This Blogger believes that, in a dystopian world, only cruelty and lethality will deter mass migration to an America soon to be devoid of unskilled jobs and drinking water. If there is another way to deter mass migration, this Blogger, nay all Joel McCrea fans, are open to it.
migrants vs.
robots
In
the interview, an aging G.I. not a RAMBO nor an Audie Murphy, just a grunt,
pulled from his factory job, his bowling league, his softball team to go fight
the Germans, tells this story.
He
is on guard duty, at a river crossing. He is a private, a combat soldier. His
Captain tells him not to allow any German,soldier or civilian to cross the
river.
All
is quiet, then a group of German refugees appear, civilians, men, women and
children, young and old appear and start swimming across the river.
He
fires into the air, half of the refugees turn back.
The
others keep coming; he puts a round in the water ahead of them.
All
turn back, save an audacious woman. She swims on.
He
fires again into the air; she still swims on.
The other refugees are on the opposite riverbank watching.
He
fires a round into the water right in front of her. She swims on.
The
interviewer, almost nonchalantly, asks
the old soldier :” What did you do?”
One
senses the interviewer is waiting for that moral moment when the soldier allows
the woman to pass to safety.
The
old soldier replies: “I killed her; no one was allowed across the
river.”
That
was an existential moment between the brave woman and the common soldier; in
existential moments there is no morality, no amorality, only lethality.
In
2018, at the border between the United States and Mexico, the sworn officers of
the Border Patrol are wrenching babies as young as those still breast feeding
from their migrant mothers.
Liberals
and Globalists are justifiably outraged; yet it is their cavalier attitude
toward migration which has caused this amorality to exist; an amorality which
will metastasize into lethality.
"Immigration is
politically destabilizing. President Trump has talked about this. I'm very
concerned about this," Mr Stringer continued.
"Immigration
today represents an existential threat to the United States.”….. Arizona Republican State legislator David
Stringer…..BBC.”
Why
is migration, the movement of desperate people from desperate situations, an
existential threat to the Republic?
On
June 15, 2018, Cardinal TIMOTHY DOLAN, ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK was on CNN being
interviewed by Chris Coumo. The Cardinal answered that question.
‘DOLAN: ....For one, St. Paul always says we should obey the law of the
government if that law is in conformity with the Lord's law, all right? No
pun intended but God's law trumps man's law, all right? And St. Paul
himself who gave the quote that the attorney general used, he wouldn't obey
Roman law when it said it was mandatory to worship the emperor. He wouldn't
obey that law.
I don't think we should obey a law that goes against what God intends that you would take a baby, a child, from their mom. I mean, that's just unjust. That's unbiblical. That's un-American. There could be no bible passage that would justify that.
….to violently take a baby from its mother's arms on the border, that's immoral. That's wrong as well.
….…. to me, that means a lot more than any particular law that we're debating about….CNN”.
I don't think we should obey a law that goes against what God intends that you would take a baby, a child, from their mom. I mean, that's just unjust. That's unbiblical. That's un-American. There could be no bible passage that would justify that.
….to violently take a baby from its mother's arms on the border, that's immoral. That's wrong as well.
….…. to me, that means a lot more than any particular law that we're debating about….CNN”.
Liberals
constantly attack President Trump for
violating the rule of law, however what is more transgressive of the rule of
law than Liberals allowing 12 million illegal aliens , claim jumpers, squatters,
to prosper in America?
On February 24, 2017,
this Blogger published;
The following is
excerpted from that Blog:
“The Trump voters
gave Donald Trump a mandate when they elected him President; the
mandate was to make the United States as UNATTRACTIVE as possible to
migrants.
Why would they do that?
The Liberals believe that
the motivation of the Trump voters was pure racism. This Blogger
disagrees; the pure motivation for the mandate is pure mathematics.
”.... About a quarter of these
potential migrants —
145 million adults — would
like to live in the United States…...NEW YORK TIMES.
….When do Liberals want
to make America unattractive to migrants? After 60 million migrants
have relocated here illegally? After 120 million? After 190 Million?
Now, when there are only
12 million illegal aliens, is the best time to make America unattractive
to watching and hopeful migrants.
This campaign to demagnetize America as an attractive destination for the millions of migrants has caused and will cause cruel and inhumane acts
… until the United States caps a ceiling on its population, which it must do to survive this era of Climate Change, it must do inhumane acts to make migration to America unattractive…THE MAXEY CHRONICLES.”
It was obvious since the
First Republican Presidential Debate in 2015 that Donald Trump was the only candidate,
Republican or Democratic who saw Migration as an existential threat to the
Republic.
On August 8, 2015, this
Blogger reflected on the First
Republican Presidential Debate, and why Donald Trump would be a compelling
candidate.
The following is excerpted from that Blog:
“….the political elite, from both
parties, have ossified into a self-destructive death spiral, incapable of
throwing up the talent
necessary to steward a nation of 320 million souls through these dangerous
and daunting times….. The Republic
is mere breathes away from dystopian times; ....a time of drought and famine, a
time of superbugs resistant to antibiotics ending the Age in which Man could defeat
Disease, ....and a time of SAVAGE religious warfare.
The next President must be capable of vision, compassion, hope,
inspiration and savagery.
…..Western Liberalism is
totally unprepared to cope with the 21st Century.
…..Blinded by a backward
ideology, the Democratic
Party is oblivious to the enormity
of the threat
facing the Republic
by mass migration. ….
….What did the Republican
"low information voter" learn from the Debate?
…….Donald Trump was
Donald Trump:” disregard my inability to be precise, understand that I have
seen the future,
and it will be rotten, but I can lead us to survival in that rotten
future”…..that is very compelling……THE MAXEY CHRONICLES….. http://themaxeychronicles.blogspot.com/2015/08/reflections-on-first-republican.html”.
Cardinal
Dolan is a very moral man, but then again so is the Dalai Lama. In 2016, the Dalai
Lama said this about refugees.
“The Dalai Lama said in an
interview …. “too many” refugees, and that they should eventually return to
help rebuild their
home countries.
“..."A
human being who is a bit more fortunate has the duty to help them. On the other
hand, there
are too many now,” he said…...”
The Dalai Lama added
that “from a moral point of view too, I think that the refugees should only be
admitted temporarily”.
“The goal should be that they return and help rebuild their countries.”….…..HINDUSTAN
TIMES.”
America would not have an existential threat in
migration if Liberals and Globalists allowed it to DEPORT refugees and migrants
a la the Dalai Lama’s suggestion. However, California’s Gov. Brown, mayors of
sanctuary cities, and Nancy Pelosi will not allow the Republic to survive by
astute deportations; they are opposed to
any deportations.
The result is amorality at the Border, soon to be
followed by lethality.
The Liberal world view of migration in the 21st
Century is wrong; it is based on the migrants’ strong work ethic.
“America
is built on a strong work ethic. … Floridatime union.”
America in the 21st Century will not
need the migrant strong work ethic, not with the rise of robots which will
decimate unskilled labor eliminating taxi drivers, delivery personnel, waitresses,
laborers, gardeners, and truck drivers among others. Sooner or later they will
invent a robot which will pick the grapes. A robot has a built-in strong
work ethic; with robots, 21st
Century America will not need the migrant strong work ethic.
‘…… Oxford University
researchers Carl Frey and Michael Osborne claim that technology will transform
many sectors of life.
.....they....found that “47 percent of U.S. workers have a high probability of seeing their
jobs automated over the next 20 years.”.....…BROOKINGS.”
47% of American workers will lose their jobs due to robots, and Liberals are content to bring more workers into the labor force by migration? THAT IS IMMORAL.
'Automation will have a
disproportionate impact on both
African-American and Latino workers because of their
overrepresentation in jobs at risk of being displaced by automation, according
to a December 2017 report from the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies....HUFF POST."
It is social madness to allow more unskilled labor into the country when American blacks and Latinos face a dystopian future because of automation.
Because of Climate Change, the rivers of the American West( the Colorado, the Rio Grande) are drying up. Major cities, Los Vegas, Phoenix, and Denver, among others, depend on their drinking water from drying up rivers. It is immoral, nay amoral to allow illegals into a thirsty America, to compete with legal Americans for drinking water.
It is social madness to allow more unskilled labor into the country when American blacks and Latinos face a dystopian future because of automation.
Because of Climate Change, the rivers of the American West( the Colorado, the Rio Grande) are drying up. Major cities, Los Vegas, Phoenix, and Denver, among others, depend on their drinking water from drying up rivers. It is immoral, nay amoral to allow illegals into a thirsty America, to compete with legal Americans for drinking water.
People
dying of thirst are not just amoral but lethal( see Africa).
Because
of robots and Climate Change, if America is to survive the dystopian 21st
Century, it must end illegal migration, by any means necessary, and also
curb legal migration. There just won’t be enough jobs and drinking water for both legal and illegal residents on American soil.
America
may also have to cull the herd. It is
this Blogger’s belief that President Trump, as a baby Boomer Male, secured his
world view from a steady diet of American Westerns as a youth: films starring
Randolph Scott, Kirk Douglas, Audie Murphy, Dale Robertson, Glenn Ford and Richard
Boone. In one such film, the actor Joel McCrea is hired as a Trail Boss for a
cattle drive to Sedalia or Wichita. He looks over the forming herd; he looks at the
lead steer and tells the ramrod to kill it. It is a stampeder.
America
may have to cull its naturalized citizens of stampeders: such as Jorge Ramos,
Samantha Bee, Tina Brown, Andrew Sullivan and John Oliver.
The
groundwork is being laid for that culling.
“LOS ANGELES — The U.S. government
agency that oversees immigration applications is launching an office that will
focus on identifying Americans who are suspected of cheating to get their
citizenship and seek to strip them of it.
….Cissna said the cases would be
referred to the Department of Justice, whose attorneys could then seek to
remove the immigrants' citizenship in civil court proceedings. In some cases,
government attorneys could bring criminal charges related to fraud.
Until
now, the agency has pursued cases as they arose but not through a coordinated
effort, Cissna said. He said he hopes the agency's new office in Los Angeles
will be running by next year but added that investigating and referring cases
for prosecution will likely take longer.
"We finally have a process in
place to get to the bottom of all these bad cases and start denaturalizing
people who should not have been naturalized in the first place," Cissna
said…..The push comes as the Trump administration has been cracking down on
illegal immigration and taking steps to reduce legal immigration to the U.S.
Immigrants who become U.S. citizens
can vote, serve on juries and obtain security clearance. Denaturalization — the
process of removing that citizenship — is very rare.
…for many years, most U.S. efforts to
strip immigrants of their citizenship focused largely on suspected war
criminals who lied on their immigration paperwork, most notably former Nazis.
…."It is clearly true that we
have entered a new chapter when a much larger number of people could feel
vulnerable that their naturalization could be reopened," Chishti said….…..…AP.”
This Blogger understands that many Americans consider the acquisition of American citizenship sacrosanct; “…..if history has taught us anything, it is that you can kill anyone….GODFATHER 2”; if there is one thing the NOTORIOUS RBG taught us in the legalization of Same-Sex marriage, it was this-EVERYTHING can be changed, EVERYTHING.This Blogger believes that, in a dystopian world, only cruelty and lethality will deter mass migration to an America soon to be devoid of unskilled jobs and drinking water. If there is another way to deter mass migration, this Blogger, nay all Joel McCrea fans, are open to it.
migrants vs.
robots
Comments
Post a Comment