Skip to main content

The Liberal Elite's Black Anne Boleyn Validates Camus' GREAT REPLACEMENT THEORY

In 2021, it is  fairly obvious that the new Liberal Elite, the new Power Elite, is comprised of senile old white men, going through their KING LEAR period of sacrificing country for flattery, young white men who are cavalier about sleeping with Communist Chinese spies, octogenarian white woman who resent society because her daughters are homely and her son is gorgeous, versus the other way around, and people of color. And people of all colors and genders,(some new to humankind), marinated in the media and entertainment  fields and not in real life. 

The new Liberal Elite has never talked to white people while in Basic Training, or in a foxhole, or while digging a ditch, or fighting forest fires, or working on a ranch, or on a factory line. 

In 2021, the Liberal Elite is feckless, clueless and obtuse to the Gestalt ramifications of their unconventional social engineering. 

In 2011, a gay French Socialist, Renaud Camus (whose parents disowned him and cut him out of his inheritance when they discovered he was gay), conjured up THE GREAT REPLACEMENT THEORY. That theory states that the native born white personages, in nations comprising Western civilization, are being replaced, with the complicity and /or cooperation of “ replacists”“ Liberal Elites, by mass migration of peoples of color. According to Camus, the whites of Western Civilization will be replaced demographically and culturally. 

Camus called it “genocide by substitution.” 

He posits that the Liberal Elite want to replace whites in the future, in the current, and more dangerously, in their collective past. A by-product of the Replacement Theory, would be the Liberal Elite making an Orwellian attempt to alter white history by substituting Black History for mainstream  white history; and in the media,  substitute Black actors for white actors in white historical dramas. 

Camus has been vilified and mocked; but it must be noted that  Camus’ Replacement Theory hovers over the 21st century with as much power as Darwin’s Theory of Evolution did over the 19th Century, and Marxism over the 20th Century. 

With that in mind, with recognition of the power of The Replacement theory in mind, let us update ourselves on how the Liberal Elite are validating Camus. 

Among the biggest lessons of the past year is that America is a country deeply divided.In the presidential election, a record numbers of voters cast ballots, and most Republicans still refuse to accept that Joe Biden won, polls show. You may recall David Lauter’s work in this newsletter early this month, reporting on the latest polling showing how deep the divide among Americans has become. 

What accounts for the nation’s polarization — and where it’s headed — is difficult to explain.My colleague Tyrone Beason has one perspective: The United States promises ideals of justice and equality but remains weighed down by a dark past. The distance between America’s aspiration and reality is the subject of a project he’s taken on after covering the 2020 election — a series he calls “My Country.” 

Tyrone’s stories from the road explore the hopes for the future among the people and communities at the center of some of this country’s biggest political debates, and relate his own experiences as well. Most recently, he visited the U.S.-Mexico border to learn more about the influx of migrants and the consequences of the Trump-era crackdowns and pandemic-related restrictions. 

I sat down with Tyrone to talk about his latest piece and what’s next. Here is our conversation, condensed and lightly edited for clarity. 

LB: Tell me how the border story came about. What inspired you?  

TB: The border story was part of my ongoing “My Country” series looking at the issues that divide and unite Americans. But also it’s a way for me, as a journalist of color, to have my own reckoning, for the world to see, with this country’s history of racism and exclusion. I was inspired by the immigration issue because I was there in Tijuana a little over two years ago (as a reporter for another paper) when Trump’s Remain in Mexico program started. Looking into the eyes of so many mothers and fathers who’d traveled for hundreds and thousands of miles just to reach our border, it did something to me as a reporter. To be able to go back, now as a reporter at The Times, with the freedom to ask these bigger moral questions about how we as a country treat the most vulnerable, with the current migrant crisis as the focus, I just couldn’t pass up this opportunity.….I was far more interested in how this country’s history and current divisions played out in people’s hearts and minds, and even at the spiritual level. These stories required a certain amount of emotional openness, I think, and I pushed myself to be present in that way, to use my own experience as a Black American as an icebreaker in some cases. My interviews on race, especially, often wound up as these intense, heart-to-heart conversations about the country itself. It makes sense to adopt this approach for a whole series of pieces and to be transparent about what I’m doing and why it matters to me, as a Black man, to do it that way. 

….. The border story is really a meditation on the meaning, the symbolism, of the barrier itself. So in a way, I was as much of an interview subject as the people I met. I visited San Diego twice for the story…..What I wanted were impressions, snapshots that flashed before the readers’ eyes the way I experienced them. Lori Riis, the horse trainer, for example: That was a brief but lovely interview conducted on the side of the fence at her property, talking to her as she sat on her horse. It was totally unplanned and off-the-cuff. I didn’t know she felt so much compassion for migrants and didn’t ask; she volunteered this outpouring of understanding. It blew me away that someone would be so open and direct about questioning our values as a country when it came to migrants….LOS ANGELES TIMES.”  

What Liberal Elitist poppycock, what Liberal Elitist gobbledegook, why the nation is polarized and divided  is that the Liberal Elitist media is ALWAYS on the side of the migrant. The Liberal Elitist Media think, by default, that the migrant is always a better person that the person he is replacing. Does anyone think that the Saxons thought about the vulnerability of  Normans who were seeking a better life? That the Lakota or Apache, or Modoc thought that the migrants of their doom deserved sympathy, because they were seeking the American Dream?  

It is the arrogance of the new Liberal Elite which propels them to increase the chances that people believe the replacement Theory is correct.  

Barry Jenkins on how new series 'Underground Railroad' challenges concept of 'Make America Great Again' 

Kevin Polowy·Senior Correspondent, Yahoo Entertainment 

…..The Underground Railroad follows the travels of tough teenager Cora (South African breakout Thuso Mbedo), who, along with the studious Caesar (Aaron Pierre), flees the wicked confines of enslavement on a Georgia plantation. William Jackson Harper costars as the Royal, a freeborn Black man who aids Cora, while Joel Edgerton plays a man hunting her. 

For Jenkins, the series serves as a message that we must acknowledge America’s dark and tragic history at a time when political slogans like former President Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” romanticize the past. 

“For me, with the journey of this show, [working on it] the past four years, ‘Make America Great Again’ has been the thing that’s been on the covers of newspapers, down the sidewalk — we filmed this entire thing in the state of Georgia so we saw quite a few red hats in our time down there,” he says. “I think in that word, there’s this cavity, this vacuum in the historical record or this failure to acknowledge what America has always been since its inception. And if we don’t acknowledge those things, then slogans like this and even worse actions, like the ones we’ve seen play out over the last year, hell, over the last 100 years, will continue to proliferate. So I think it’s important to fill in those cavities and to acknowledge the truth of what this country is.” 

….“I’m hoping that this is one of those pieces that makes people question themselves, and I’m hoping that it makes people question the folks who they’ve surrounded themselves with,” says Harper (The Good Place, We Broke Up). “I think we all like to think that when it comes to freedom or inequality, that we all would’ve been on the right side of history. And the fact of the matter is, a lot of us would not have been.” 

Adds Atim (Bounty Hunters): “I think it’s really time to see a story about slavery and about race-based oppression. I feel like this story is a call to arms in a way. …. we cannot shy away from that history. We cannot bury it. We cannot ignore it.”…YAHOO ENTERTAINMENT.” 

“I think it’s really time to see a story about slavery and about race-based oppression” 

What Liberal Elitist  malarkey,” In January 1977, ABC aired "Roots," an eight-night miniseries based on Alex Haley's best-selling 1976 book "Roots: The Saga of an American Family." The series, which drew an estimated 130 million viewers, called America's attention to the brutality of slavery and its effects on generations of African Americans.” 

Does anyone think that 130 million Americans are going to watch UNDERGROUND RAILROAD? With an African lead?The new Liberal Elite firmly believes that there is no Blood memory; this Blogger believes, that out of the 130 million viewers, enough are still alive to nurture an American  Blood Memory, about a black boy being whipped to within an inch of his life because he would not say his slave name. That is race based oppression.

If one does not believe in Blood Memory, in Gestalt ramifications, in Jung; then one is liable to make the missteps which allow Camus’ Theory to prosper, like a banyan tree; and like a banyan tree it will destroy. 

The Liberal Elite pay lip service to the sanctity of History; yet, YET, they violate History with some crass foolishness that reinforce and validate Camus’ theory. 

The most egregious example is the casting of a Black Jamaican actor as Anne Boleyn, the wife of Henry VIII, the mother of Elizabeth I. 

The Gestalt ramification of this casting decision is enormous; it validates Camus’ Theory  that the Liberal Elite intend to replace whites in their own history. Is this Reverse Cultural Appropriation, revenge for Paul Muni playing a Mexican and Asian, or Marlon Brando playing a Mexican and Asian? Or Lord Olivier playing the Mahdi in blackface?  

If it is revenge; it is poorly timed, what with the Replacement Theory burning out of control on the fringes of civility. 

“Jodie Turner-Smith (picture below) transformed into Anne Boleyn in a first look image at the new drama of the same name, after being cast as the first black actress to play Henry VIII's second wife in a bid to 'challenge conventions'. 

….The upcoming series - scheduled to air later this year - explores the final moments of the queen's life from her lens as she attempts to tackle patriarchy and struggles to secure a life for her daughter, before she is executed by her husband.  

The cast also includes I May Destroy You's Paapa Essiedu, who will portray the role of Anne's brother and Tudor nobleman George,….Penned by writer Eve Hedderwick Turner and directed by Lynsey Miller, Anne Boleyn aims to 'challenge all the conventions of who we think Anne Boleyn was and shines a feminist light on her story.'…. 

Fable Pictures added: 'We're absolutely thrilled to have the magnetic Jodie Turner-Smith on board to encapsulate Anne's determination to be an equal among men and to pave a path for her daughter.  

'We feel that history has side-lined the voice of this ambitious Queen in favour of the men who brought her down, and that Lynsey Miller's beautiful, intimate vision will put Anne's gaze at the heart of the piece.'  

Ben Frow, director of programs at ViacomCBS, added: 'This project re-frames her story as a propulsive psychological thriller, told from a new perspective, with top talent like Jodie Turner-Smith attached.  

'It was simply too irresistible to say no to and I'm very excited to see the finished product.'….  

Director Miller previously defended the decision to give the role to a black actress, after sparking accusations of 'blackwashing'. 

The TV executive said: 'I feel very strongly that we have the best actress for the role so I am happy to stand by it. 

'I'm very proud of what we have created together, so let them talk.  

Born the daughter of Thomas Boleyn, 1st Earl of Wiltshire, and his wife, Lady Elizabeth Howard, in 1501, she first came into the eye-sight of Henry VIII in 1522 when she secured a post at court as maid of honour to the king's first Catherine of Aragon. 

It was not until 1526 that Henry began his pursuit of Anne - a pursuit which was initially resisted. 

Her refusal to be a mistress sparked Henry to approach the then-Pope to have his marriage annulled. 

When it became clear this would not be allowed, Henry began his drive to break the power of the Catholic Church in England - what later became known as the English Reformation. 

Henry and Anne formally married in January 1533 - a move which resulted in the Pope excommunicating Henry and him consequently taking control of the Church of England.  …DAILY MAIL.” 

This casting of a Black actor to play Anne Boleyn is a direct evolution from casting Black actors in the Tudor Era film, MARY, QUEEN OF SCOTS as Scottish lairds and Elizabethan grandees. In that film, Josie Rourke, the  Orwellian female Director, cast a black actor as Queen Elizabeth’s Ambassador to the Scottish Court. ". Rourke told TheWrap that colorblind casting a period drama was important to her, because of the many years black and other people of color were left out of such portrayals and films.“I was really clear, I would not direct an all-white period drama,” director Josie Rourke tells TheWrap.

Can one get more Orwellian, more Stalinist, than that? Rourke changes history to conform to her Stalinist/Liberal Elitist  Diversity.

The Liberal Elite cannot understand why the white working class in Great Britain is turning away from the elitist Labour Party to the Conservative Party of Boris Johnson, which has pledged not to tamper with British history for the sake of Diversity. It is because of a Black Anne Boleyn.

This Diversity casting opens the door to casting Sean Hayes to play Shaka Zulu, Jonah Hill to play Jim Brown, Justin Bieber to play Nelson Mandela, all unconventional choices.  

This Blogger will never understand the Liberal Elite mindset and their obliviousness to the consequences, the Gestalt consequences, of their actions. They blame the anti-Asian paroxysm of hate infecting the nation on President Trump calling COVID-19, the China Virus….yet they fail to see that corrupting history itself, by replacing whites with blacks, for Diversity or inclusion, is not a viable nor sustainable path forward, but a dangerous exercise in incesteous folly.  

If the Liberal Elite do win the Cultural War of reverse Cultural Appropriation, validating Camus’ Replacement Theory, then the inevitable consequence will be a shooting war, rivaling the Spanish Civil War.


Jodie Turner-Smith as Anne Boleyn







The Anne Boleyn who changed history



Paapa Essiedu will play Anne Boleyn's brother.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Urination Of Nicole Kidman's Career

I went to see EYES WIDE SHUT in total awe of its Director, Stanley Kubrick, who had in his career Directed THE GREATEST Science Fiction/Cosmological film EVER- 2001, SPACE ODYSSEY, the BEST and MOST INSIGHTFUL film essay on American culture EVER- LOLITA, arguably the greatest war movie ever- PATHS OF GLORY, and one of the best film epics ever- SPARTACUS. Mr. Kubrick died SUDDENLY, before EYES WIDE SHUT was released. Everyone was so sad. Then I saw EYES WIDE SHUT, and understood exactly why Herr Director Kubrick had croaked so suddenly; he had willed himself to death before the release of the film, so that  he would not have to suffer the slings and shots against his declining genius. EYES WIDE SHUT is the WORST, laughably worst, porn film ever made, EVER. It starred that larger than life couple(at the time), Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman. The key scene in the film was Ms. Kidman peeing. I was spending over $60.00(including tickets,parking and snacks for m...

The Crash of Flight 447: Fate, Moliere and Veronique Gaignard

In 1954 there was the film, THE HIGH AND THE MIGHTY about danger in the air; that was followed by the 1964 film, FATE IS THE HUNTER about a fatal airplane crash and the followup investigation; followed by the 1970 film, AIRPORT, about a bomber on a plane, starring every living star in Hollywood at the time; followed by  the sequels, AIRPORT 75, AIRPORT 77, AIRPORT 79- THE CONCORDE. All that melodramatic danger in the air was laughed to death by the films AIRPLANE in 1980, followed by AIRPLANE II in 1982. Everything in air flight had been covered, both the tragedy and the comedy  of air travel, until Air France Flight 447. Flight 447 was the Air France  Airbus Flight from Brazil to France, which,in 2009, crashed in the South Atlantic , killing all on board,228 passengers. Airbuses fly by wire, which means they fly by computers rather than the old mechanical ways.  Very up to date, except when something goes awry, then it seems it is very diff...

France- Bastille Day, July 14, 2024,....Waiting for the Generals

Bastille Day is the National Holiday of France, under Republican regimes. It celebrates the storming of a decaying prison during the French Revolution, by a frenzied mob. Emmanuel Macron is one of those specific French wunderkinds; who thinks he is more sophisticated than anyone; because, as a high school student, he attended a high school drama club and seduced the mother of a fellow student; who was supervising the club. They married in 2007. Macron is one of those specific French wunderkinds, who thinks he is smarter than History, Russian Cossacks, Prussian generals, Vietnamese guerillas and Algerian nationalists.  Smarter than History itself, smarter than historical determinism, smarter than ancient enmities.  He isn’t. Macron was a Socialist politician; but he broke ranks and broke the French  Socialist Party by  running for the Presidency, in 2017, as the candidate of a new party; which he had founded, centered around himself. He won 66% of the vote, defeating ...